avatar
#1 добавлено: 05 Jun 2016 @ 23:08 CET цитировать
  • 0

image

Administration is interested in your feedbacks and suggestions to improve the Nation League for the next seaons.

We are mostly concerned in topics such as:

- Invited Nations

- stand-in policy adjustments: who can play where

- merged Nations (World Union, Eastern Team, Scandinavia,..): new/edit merged teams

- default time: feedbacks

- NW format (4x 1v1+ 1x 2v2): any changes

Use your NL tagged account if you want your opinion to worth more.

Thank You

Отредактировано iCup.Face (05 Jun 2016 @ 23:54 CET)
Старый коммент
avatar
  • 17 Jul 2017 @ 19:28 CET
  • 29 Feb 2016
#2 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 00:58 CET цитировать
  • 0

having the time slot a couple hours later would be great, 9am is really early to wake up and play bw and i think would help attendance from north/south american teams

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 22 Jan 2017 @ 22:40 CET
  • 20 Sep 2015
#3 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 02:38 CET цитировать
  • 0

All was ok i think... mb just make more strong teams, America team(latin players) and scan+et about PE CL ET was weak i think this last nation was amazing for PL RU and mb for CA/GER

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 27 Sep 2020 @ 11:36 CET
  • 04 Mar 2016
#4 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 08:48 CET цитировать
  • 0

1) Agree idea about time clan war ! need add option when teams can chaice time

2) Agree idea about more strong teams mb 5-6 but strong

3) Open line up ! Face i am russian+commentator i see all games on league we need do something for see more intresting games. And first idea its sure when leaders can add players in line up 1 be 1 like u first add Eonzerg i do contra good TvZ player next i add 1 player u add contra player(for all players play best match ups)

3) Dont agree Scan on league, sorry its Nation league not korean proleague

4) Dont agree games on FS and CB too macro and very long dong intresting games

5) if ET its ex-USSR countrys add here Russia too, who dont playing in Russia nation team

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 13 Feb 2017 @ 16:37 CET
  • 13 Sep 2015
#5 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 16:24 CET цитировать
  • 1

I support the suggestion for a later time (maybe 2h later?) to make it more convenient for players coming from north/south America. For Europeans this change shouldn't hurt.

Implementing entirely new teams to the current Nation League is probably not a good idea, as they have almost no chance of making the playoffs and them disbanding after a short time seems therefore highly likely.

I don't know if other teams are understaffed but if there are, then maybe you can make something like a free agent player pool where the active players from the disbanded countries can sign up and the understaffed Nations can pick them up (if the region is at least similar)?

What I would personally like is a pre-submitted line-up like 2 days in advance and a fixed set of 3 maps every week instead of the loser pick format. Just take the first 3 MOTW maps for example or 2 MOTW and FS to not have all players riot. As the format is now, there is no preparation possible, there are just too much variables. Unfortunately, I don't think pre-submitted team lineups are feasible nowadays and would only lead to more walkovers.

Старый коммент
avatar
  • today @ 21:11 CET
  • today @ 21:11 CET
# добавлено: today @ 21:11 CET цитировать
  •  
  •  
  •   
avatar
  • 06 Apr 2017 @ 16:03 CET
  • 17 Nov 2012
#6 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 16:59 CET цитировать
  • 0

"I support the suggestion for a later time (maybe 2h later?) to make it more convenient for players coming from north/south America. For Europeans this change shouldn't hurt." (AGREE) chuck.png

Отредактировано TokyoA[RU] (06 Jun 2016 @ 16:59 CET)
Старый коммент
avatar
  • 06 Jun 2017 @ 22:37 CET
  • 17 Feb 2016
#7 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 18:42 CET цитировать
  • 0

DragOn[CA] :
having the time slot a couple hours later would be great, 9am is really early to wake up and play bw and i think would help attendance from north/south american teams

Agree! ara.gif

What happened with chilean team? maybe they dont know this league continue... popcorm.gif

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 23 Oct 2016 @ 06:56 CET
  • 14 Mar 2016
#8 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 19:15 CET цитировать
  • 0

+1 on later time.

Also agree with cryoc, we should be using motw, otherwise preparing is unrealistic. A possibility would be having a set first map (motw) and then loser pick from remaining motw rather than entire iccup map pack

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 12 Oct 2018 @ 18:05 CET
  • 01 Dec 2010
#9 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 21:01 CET цитировать
  • 0

more flexibility to schedule matches,it happens to us that for the day of the cw we always having troubles,and this for others teams,i remember vs ET we moved the clanwar for a better day both of us.im sure team can always find a later date to play if there is interest from both sides,ofc we cant play cat and mouse game about pp games.

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 17 Feb 2017 @ 03:12 CET
  • 20 Sep 2015
#10 добавлено: 06 Jun 2016 @ 23:14 CET цитировать
  • 0

I think eonzerg will agree with me here, that Julian_pl should start every match with a 1:0 lead. I vote for this change.

Also 2h later start should be good.

Старый коммент
avatar
#11 добавлено: 07 Jun 2016 @ 00:33 CET цитировать
  • 0

what about open line up add players 1 be 1, we more nice games not 1 Best game on week

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 22 Jan 2017 @ 22:40 CET
  • 20 Sep 2015
#12 добавлено: 07 Jun 2016 @ 01:56 CET цитировать
  • 0

iccup.Jin :
what about open line up add players 1 be 1, we more nice games not 1 Best game on week

sounds like fragbet?

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 12 Oct 2018 @ 18:05 CET
  • 01 Dec 2010
#13 добавлено: 07 Jun 2016 @ 10:53 CET цитировать
  • 0

Julian[pl] :
I think eonzerg will agree with me here, that Julian_pl should start every match with a 1:0 lead. I vote for this change.

Also 2h later start should be good.

you are wrong,i actually think is a waste of time for godzilla to play his games so pretty much 2-0 without playing :D

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 01 Sep 2016 @ 09:56 CET
  • 26 Mar 2016
#14 добавлено: 08 Jun 2016 @ 14:23 CET цитировать
  • 0

I think there is a big problem in organization of CWs: for teams it is advantageous to be undisciplined.

It is a common situaion when one team comes to CW well prepaired: trained and rested, while the other team doesn't come (has 1-2 players online). OFC first team can just take w.o. but it will get just +3pts for them so they have to agree to postpone all but 1-2 games and EITHER the time for postponed games is set by the second team last moment (next saturday CET afternoon) to be uncomfortable for the first team OR players of the second team come within an hour or two, while players of the first team are getting tired, stressed and discouraged.

The only lesson that each player gets from such a situation is: "Just come when it is comfortable for you and ignore any schedule".

There is an easy solution for such a problem: just give official permission to w.o. any INDIVIDUAL set (any 1x1 or 2x2 pair) based on the fact that one of the teams doesn't have player(s) for this set online within 15 minutes after the time CW has started (OFC this can be overridden by taking official wildcard).

Старый коммент
avatar
  • 17 Jun 2018 @ 23:16 CET
  • 26 Nov 2015
#15 добавлено: 08 Jun 2016 @ 14:47 CET цитировать
  • 0

Proposes to create POL-B, we have many players and gives us an opportunity to take the first two places on the podium.

By the way, increase attendance at CL

Старый коммент
Хотите оставить сообщение? Вступайте в наши ряды!, или представьтесь.