avatar
  • 26 Feb 2017 @ 22:05 CET
  • 19 Jan 2013
#16 Posted: 08 Jun 2016 @ 21:15 CET quote
  • 0

The proposal of creating Pol-B team is a real thing, more than possible. We have many players eager to play who are not chosen to play by Pol-A captain.

Also with the current changes, as in Chile and Scandinavia teams being disbanded I think we should change the play-off format. Here is one example: we are gonna have 2 seperate rounds. 1st and 2nd place from each round of the league advance to play-offs. If a winner or 2nd place holder ends up being 1st or 2nd in the second round, 3rd team advances to the play-offs.

Allowing sth like this would allow us to create more teams with giving them a real chance at winning the whole thing. Of course we'd have to think of a way to motivate first and second place holders to go for a win in the 2nd round as well.

I'm not gonna go into details. That's a general idea. Can ellaborate, if there is a need for it.

Old comment
avatar
#17 Posted: 08 Jun 2016 @ 22:07 CET quote
  • 0

yes yes good idea lets make poland lation league obama.png

more good ideas ;) ?

Old comment
avatar
  • 26 Feb 2017 @ 22:05 CET
  • 19 Jan 2013
#18 Posted: 08 Jun 2016 @ 22:12 CET quote
  • 0

2 teams is not the whole league, eh? I vote for active league!

Old comment
avatar
#19 Posted: 08 Jun 2016 @ 22:53 CET quote
  • 0

punish.gif for active need more good leaders (1 more idea league can be not from this nation like coach in football), for more interes players need more moneys, for more donates need more vievewers, for vievewrs need more intresting games

Old comment
avatar
  • 17 Jun 2018 @ 23:16 CET
  • 26 Nov 2015
#20 Posted: 09 Jun 2016 @ 12:25 CET quote
  • 0

passing game v / o does not attract more viewers. It is better to play a game that more or less attract viewers than at all.

Emotions that will be in the fight for the final between Pol Pol-A-B will reach the zenith.

Old comment
avatar
#21 Posted: 09 Jun 2016 @ 13:09 CET quote
  • 0

NW.Kingpin facepalm.png

Old comment
Head Admin Assistant
avatar
IT roia123 [ Head Admin Assistant ]
#22 Posted: 09 Jun 2016 @ 14:35 CET quote
  • 0

In the actual conditions where we haven't 10 teams, having a second team from the most populated Nations (example POL-B and RUS-B) can be a good idea as long as players don't jump between -A and -B during the league.

We may evaluate the thing.

Old comment
avatar
  • 17 Jun 2018 @ 23:16 CET
  • 26 Nov 2015
#23 Posted: 11 Jun 2016 @ 12:33 CET quote
  • 0

Regulations may define clearly banning jumping between representations. This is no problem at all.

Old comment
avatar
  • 16 Sep 2019 @ 18:30 CET
  • 01 Mar 2011
#24 Posted: 12 Jun 2016 @ 21:35 CET quote
  • 0

how about iFU vs Nations ? :)

we got pretty solid line up :)

Edited by iFU.ZerGgBoY (12 Jun 2016 @ 21:35 CET)
Old comment
avatar
#25 Posted: 13 Jun 2016 @ 00:04 CET quote
  • 0

u will be cap RUS-B :)

Old comment
avatar
  • 17 Jun 2018 @ 23:16 CET
  • 26 Nov 2015
#26 Posted: 17 Jun 2016 @ 13:35 CET quote
  • 0

ZBoY u can play IFU vs NW and we will se what pretty your line up is.

Old comment
avatar
  • 22 Jan 2017 @ 19:20 CET
  • 04 Mar 2016
#27 Posted: 28 Jun 2016 @ 05:24 CET quote
  • 0

Hi! it would be great if 1x1 card always was included in the motw. now 2x2 in motw(jade), hbr not.

Edited by zolo[RU] (28 Jun 2016 @ 05:25 CET)
Old comment
avatar
  • 23 Oct 2016 @ 06:56 CET
  • 14 Mar 2016
#28 Posted: 01 Jul 2016 @ 02:51 CET quote
  • 0

Why was the time change to default CW time (2 hours later) not implemented for round 2 when everyone commenting on the thread is in agreement on it?

Old comment
Head Admin Assistant
avatar
IT roia123 [ Head Admin Assistant ]
#29 Posted: 01 Jul 2016 @ 03:12 CET quote
  • 0

We can apply it in week14 if Americans really need for.

Old comment
Head Admin Assistant
avatar
IT roia123 [ Head Admin Assistant ]
#30 Posted: 03 Jul 2016 @ 17:16 CET quote
  • 0

Do you think we should reduce to 3 per 1v1 slots for next season?

Old comment
Do you want to take part in forum discussions? Join us!, or Login.